Despite the harsh conditions, Arctic plants grow in a multitude of forms, colors, and sizes in the tundra. However, Arctic tundra soil is known to be nutrient-limited, especially in terms of nitrogen. An international research team has now challenged the general notion that Arctic plants have no need for nitrate. Their results obtained in the tundra region of Alaska show that Arctic plants can absorb nitrate at comparable rates to any vegetation in nitrate-rich areas
Nitrogen, an essential plant nutrient, is most readily absorbed by plants in its ammonium and nitrate forms. Because of the very low nitrate levels found in arctic tundra soil, scientists had assumed that plants in this biome do not use nitrate. But a new study co-authored by four Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) Ecosystems Center scientists challenges this notion. The study, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, found that plants in northern Alaska’s tussock tundra took up nitrate at comparable rates to vegetation in nitrate-rich ecosystems. Nitrate contributed about one-third of the nitrogen the tundra plants used. Some of the species studied, such as Polygonum bistorta, a pink flowering plant, took up nitrate at even higher rates than species found in low-latitude, high-nitrate environments.
The findings are important in the context of human-caused climate change, which is expected to increase nitrogen, and potentially nitrate, levels in tundra soil. As the climate warms, the microbial processes that generate nitrate could speed up. In addition, permafrost — a layer of soil below the surface that remains frozen throughout the year — could thaw, adding additional nitrogen to the ecosystem. Some of this nitrogen could be converted to nitrate. The tussock tundra covers a large part of northern Alaska and is currently composed of sedges, herbaceous ground cover, and woody shrubs (about a third coverage for each). The landscape’s productivity is limited by nitrogen availability. If released from this limitation, woody shrub species, such as birch and willow, could become more dominant and shade out other plants as the climate warms. The discovery that nitrate is an important nitrogen source for tundra plants will need to be factored into future projections of species composition. “As the nutrients start cycling faster and the vegetation starts growing faster, that should stimulate all the vegetation on the tundra. After a while, the woody species should be able to overtop the ones that don’t have stems, that can’t stand up that high. So you tend to lose the sedges and the mosses and the lichens,” explained study co-author Ed Rastetter, a senior scientist at the MBL Ecosystems Center and principal investigator for the National Science Foundation’s Arctic Long-Term Ecological Research site at Toolik Lake, Alaska, where part of the research was conducted. Because nitrogen and carbon cycles are tightly coupled, the team’s discovery might also alter projections of carbon storage or release from arctic ecosystems as the climate warms. The world’s permafrost is packed with the remnants of plants and animals accumulated over thousands of years, and it contains twice as much carbon as is currently in the atmosphere. Rastetter stresses that more research is needed to confirm the study’s findings and to better understand the importance of nitrate relative to other forms of nitrogen in arctic tundra ecosystems.
Source: Paul McDivitt / Marine Biological Laboratory